The Register: Microsoft accuses Google of creating a lobbying front called ‘Open Cloud Coalition’

Source URL: https://www.theregister.com/2024/10/29/open_cloud_coalition_microsoft_google/
Source: The Register
Title: Microsoft accuses Google of creating a lobbying front called ‘Open Cloud Coalition’

Feedly Summary: Seemingly dissatisfied with CISPE settlement, new UK-centric cloudy industry group calls for end to ‘restrictive licensing’
Microsoft has alleged that a new group of cloud providers and users is a front for Google – a notion the ads and search giant rejects.…

AI Summary and Description: Yes

**Summary:** This text discusses allegations made by Microsoft regarding a coalition formed by Google and other cloud providers, which Microsoft claims is an “astroturf” group aimed at discrediting its cloud services. The conversation revolves around competition, regulation, and strategies in the cloud computing space, particularly in Europe.

**Detailed Description:**

The text highlights a significant clash between two cloud computing giants, Microsoft and Google, in the context of competition and regulatory scrutiny in the cloud industry. Major points include:

– **Astroturf Group Allegation:** Microsoft’s deputy general counsel, Rima Alaily, argues that Google has formed an “astroturfing” organization – a superficially grassroots group designed to manipulate public perception and mislead regulators against Microsoft.
– **Open Cloud Coalition Members:** The newly formed Open Cloud Coalition (OCC) includes a mix of European cloud operators alongside Google Cloud. The coalition aims to advocate for open standards and fair regulations while promoting diversity in cloud providers.
– **Microsoft’s Reaction:** Microsoft has claimed that the coalition operates under Google’s influence, with allegations that it may be a strategy to distract from Google’s own competition and troubles, particularly related to antitrust issues.
– **Regulatory Challenges:** The text illustrates the ongoing legal battles over competitive practices, including Microsoft’s previous settlements concerning licensing tactics seen as anti-competitive, and Google’s complaints about the costs of running Microsoft software on non-Azure platforms.
– **Implications for the Cloud Market:** The conflict raises significant implications for the cloud computing market, including how new regulations may be shaped in response to competitive practices and alliances.

**Key Insights for Security and Compliance Professionals:**

– **Regulatory Landscape Awareness:** Companies operating in the cloud space must stay informed about the evolving regulatory landscape, especially in Europe, where scrutiny of competitive practices is intensifying.
– **Impact of Public Perception:** The importance of analyzing how organizations engage in reputational strategies and how these can influence public perception and regulatory outcomes.
– **Collaboration and Standards:** Efforts toward open standards and collaboration may signal a shift in how cloud services are evaluated and utilized, making it crucial for security and compliance professionals to align with these emerging frameworks.

This dispute underlines the complexities surrounding competition in cloud services and highlights the ongoing need for vigilance and adaptability among industry professionals regarding security, compliance, and regulatory strategies.