Anchore: SSDF Attestation Template: Battle-tested Compliance Guidance

Source URL: https://anchore.com/blog/announcing-ssdf-attestation-template/
Source: Anchore
Title: SSDF Attestation Template: Battle-tested Compliance Guidance

Feedly Summary: The CISA Secure Software Development Attestation form, commonly referred to as, SSDF attestation, was released earlier this year and with any new compliance framework, knowing the exact wording and details to provide in order to meet the compliance requirements can be difficult. We feel you here. Anchore is heavily invested in the public sector and […]
The post SSDF Attestation Template: Battle-tested Compliance Guidance appeared first on Anchore.

AI Summary and Description: Yes

**Summary:**
The text discusses the CISA Secure Software Development Framework (SSDF) attestation process, presenting it as a crucial compliance measure for organizations, especially those engaging with federal agencies. Anchore shares its experiences in generating an SSDF attestation and provides a guide to help other organizations navigate the compliance requirements efficiently.

**Detailed Description:**
The provided text emphasizes the importance of the SSDF attestation for compliance within software development, especially when interacting with U.S. government entities. Anchore has created guidance documents aimed at simplifying the SSDF attestation process, highlighting their first-hand experience and success in achieving compliance. Key points include:

– **Raw Compliance Framework:**
– The SSDF attestation form can be complex, requiring detailed evidence about the security of development and production environments.
– The SSDF does not set strict rules for compliance per organization, making it essential to provide adequate evidence.

– **Three Sections of the SSDF Attestation Form:**
– **Section I:** Basic information regarding the attestation type and product.
– **Section II:** Contact details for communication with CISA.
– **Section III:** Technical details that substantiate compliance with SSDF requirements. The guide from Anchore focuses specifically on this section.

– **Submission Process:**
– A completed SSDF attestation form must be submitted through the Repository for Software Attestations and Artifacts by U.S. government vendors.
– There is consideration for agencies that might not use this repository, indicating the need for flexibility in submission methods.

– **Tools for Compliance:**
– The text lists various DevSecOps tools that help meet SSDF compliance, each paired with its purpose and examples:
– **Endpoint Protection:** Safeguards devices from malware.
– **Source Control:** Manages changes to source code.
– **CI/CD Build Pipeline:** Automates software development processes.
– **Single Sign-On (SSO):** Simplifies user authentication.
– **Security Event and Incident Management (SEIM):** Monitors system security events.
– **Audit Logging:** Tracks system activity.
– **Secrets Encryption:** Secures sensitive information.
– **Secrets Scanning:** Detects leaked secrets in code repositories.
– **OSS Component Inventory (+ Provenance):** Keeps an inventory of open-source components and their origins.
– **Vulnerability Scanning:** Identifies security weaknesses.
– **Vulnerability Management and Remediation Runbook:** Provides guidelines for handling discovered vulnerabilities.

– **Next Steps and Assistance:**
– Anchore offers support for organizations looking to fulfill SSDF attestation and emphasize the importance of compliance not only for federal contracts but also in enhancing overall security posture.

This analysis is crucial for security and compliance professionals, providing insights into the SSDF attestation framework and its relevance in limiting risks associated with software development, ultimately enabling organizations to better align with compliance requirements.