Hacker News: Breaking CityHash64, MurmurHash2/3, wyhash, and more

Source URL: https://orlp.net/blog/breaking-hash-functions/
Source: Hacker News
Title: Breaking CityHash64, MurmurHash2/3, wyhash, and more

Feedly Summary: Comments

AI Summary and Description: Yes

**Summary:** The text provides an extensive analysis of the security implications of various hash functions, focusing on their vulnerability to attacks. It discusses the mathematical foundations of hash functions, their roles in computer security, and specific examples of non-cryptographic hash functions that can be easily broken. This is particularly relevant for professionals engaged in security, particularly in understanding the weaknesses of hash functions used in data protection and integrity verification.

**Detailed Description:**
The text leverages an in-depth examination of hash functions, which are pivotal for ensuring data integrity and security across computing platforms. Here are the major points discussed:

– **Definition and Utility of Hash Functions:**
– Hash functions map arbitrary-sized data to fixed-size outputs, maintaining deterministic randomness.
– Common uses include hash tables, checksums, and cryptographic security.

– **Security Vulnerabilities:**
– The author highlights the risks associated with weaker hash functions, specifically non-cryptographic ones such as **MurmurHash** and **CityHash** that allow for efficient collision generation, undermining system security.
– Examples are presented where crafted inputs generate the same hash output, showcasing vulnerabilities to hash flooding attacks (HashDoS).

– **Mathematical Properties:**
– The text outlines essential cryptographic properties of secure hash functions: pre-image resistance, second pre-image resistance, and collision resistance.
– It emphasizes that breaking these properties renders a hash function insecure.

– **Performance vs. Security:**
– While cryptographic hash functions offer security, they often come with performance costs. Newer functions like **BLAKE3** aim to balance speed and security.

– **Practical Implications:**
– The necessity for using securely randomized seeds in hash functions to prevent pre-mediated collision attacks is highlighted.
– It is crucial for system designers to be aware of the vulnerabilities of common hash functions and to adopt safer alternatives, especially in environments exposed to potential security threats.

– **Conclusion on Hash Function Choices:**
– The article cautions against reliance on vulnerable hash functions and advocates for the adoption of universal hashing techniques that mathematically ensure resistance to certain types of attacks, enhancing overall security.

This analysis emphasizes the critical need for professionals in security, privacy, and compliance to scrutinize the hash functions employed in their systems carefully and to consider their appropriateness based on security requirements and risk assessments. The continuous evolution of hashing techniques and their vulnerabilities should be closely monitored to safeguard data integrity and prevent exploitation.