The Register: This uni thought it would be a good idea to do a phishing test with a fake Ebola scare

Source URL: https://www.theregister.com/2024/08/22/ucsc_phishing_test_ebola/
Source: The Register
Title: This uni thought it would be a good idea to do a phishing test with a fake Ebola scare

Feedly Summary: Needless to say, it backfired in a big way
University of California Santa Cruz (UCSC) students may be relieved to hear that an emailed warning about a staff member infected with the Ebola virus was just a phishing exercise.…

AI Summary and Description: Yes

**Summary:** The University of California Santa Cruz (UCSC) engaged in a phishing simulation that created significant concern within its community by erroneously sending an email about a staff member allegedly infected with the Ebola virus. This incident highlights the delicate balance in cybersecurity training when it comes to simulating real threats, emphasizing the need for sensitivity to avoid misinformation and panic.

**Detailed Description:**
The incident at UCSC serves as a critical case study in the realm of cybersecurity training, particularly regarding phishing simulations. While the university intended to raise awareness about phishing attacks, the approach taken was problematic and led to unintended consequences. Key points include:

– **Phishing Simulation Purpose:** The email aimed to educate the university community on the dangers of phishing schemes by mimicking a common tactic where urgent health alerts prompt individuals to provide personal or login information.

– **Community Reaction:** The message caused unnecessary panic, leading to a prompt response from university officials to clarify that it was a simulation. Brian Hall, the chief information security officer, acknowledged the inappropriate nature of the email content, which potentially undermined trust in public health communications.

– **Historical Context of Ebola:** Relevant data included the last reported Ebola infection in South Africa being recorded in 1996, bringing to light the importance of factual accuracy when choosing a scenario for educational exercises.

– **Criticism of Simulation Methodology:** Experts such as Marcus Hutchins and Matt Linton criticized the practice of using shocking scenarios in simulations. They suggested that such methods could foster distrust between employees and security teams and advocated for training that emphasizes recognition and proper reporting of phishing threats without inducing fear.

– **Ongoing Security Awareness Efforts:** Despite the misstep, UCSC remains committed to enhancing cybersecurity through regular training and simulated phishing campaigns tailored to remind staff and students about real phishing tactics.

This case not only illustrates the potential pitfalls of phishing simulations but also underscores the need for cybersecurity awareness programs to balance effectiveness with sensitivity, especially when choosing critical or potentially alarming scenarios. It is crucial for security and compliance professionals in educational and organizational settings to learn from this incident and refine their training methods accordingly to avoid similar miscommunications in the future.